Dapsone

Evidence Level: L1 Predicted Indications: 1

Table of Contents

  1. Dapsone
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Dapsone: sulfone antibacterial (dihydropteroate synthase inhibitor) → pneumocystosis
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. Canada Market Information
    9. Safety Considerations
    10. Conclusion and Next Steps
    11. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Dapsone: sulfone antibacterial (dihydropteroate synthase inhibitor) → pneumocystosis

One-Sentence Summary

Dapsone is a sulfone antibacterial and anti-inflammatory drug marketed in Canada. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for pneumocystosis, with 10 clinical trials and 20 publications compiled for this report supporting this direction. The trials include several completed Phase 3 studies of dapsone in Pneumocystis pneumonia prevention and treatment.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not recorded in the local data
Predicted New Indication pneumocystosis
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9973
Evidence Level L1
Canada Market Status Marketed (marketed DINs: 2 of 2)
Number of DINs 2 (marketed: 2)
Recommended Decision Proceed with Guardrails

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the compiled record. Based on established pharmacology, dapsone is a sulfone that inhibits dihydropteroate synthase in the folate synthesis pathway, the same target as sulfonamides such as sulfamethoxazole.

Pneumocystis jirovecii depends on this folate pathway, so a drug acting there is mechanistically plausible. This fits the very high prediction score and the clinical activity of dapsone in Pneumocystis pneumonia prophylaxis and treatment.

This is effectively an already-established use, since dapsone is a guideline-recognized alternative to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, rather than a novel repurposing signal. The mechanistic link comes from established pharmacology, not from the supplied record.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT00000802 Phase 3 Completed 700 Daily dapsone vs daily atovaquone for PCP prophylaxis in HIV patients intolerant of trimethoprim/sulfonamides
NCT00001028 Phase 3 Completed 400 Monthly aerosolized pentamidine vs thrice-weekly dapsone for PCP prophylaxis
NCT00000640 Phase 3 Completed 290 Dapsone/trimethoprim and clindamycin/primaquine vs TMP-SMX for mild-to-moderate PCP
NCT00000991 Phase 3 Completed 600 Three anti-Pneumocystis regimens (dapsone among them) plus zidovudine for primary prevention in advanced HIV
NCT00000739 Phase 1 Completed 96 Daily vs weekly oral dapsone for PCP prophylaxis in HIV-infected children (toxicity, pharmacokinetics)
NCT00002120 Phase 1 Completed 20 Trimetrexate with leucovorin plus dapsone vs TMP-SMX in moderately severe PCP; dapsone is part of a combination
NCT00002283 Not applicable Completed Not reported Dapsone plus trimethoprim vs TMP-SMX for first-episode PCP in AIDS patients
NCT00002043 Not applicable Completed Not reported Dapsone 100 mg vs 50 mg for primary PCP prophylaxis
NCT02550080 Phase 4 Unknown 3130 HLA-B*1301 genetic screening to reduce dapsone hypersensitivity syndrome; a safety study, not an efficacy study

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
38583518 2024 Systematic review / network meta-analysis Clin Microbiol Infect Compares PCP prophylaxis regimens in people living with HIV, including dapsone-based regimens, TMP-SMX, pentamidine and atovaquone
39732393 2025 Systematic review / network meta-analysis Clin Microbiol Infect Compares treatment regimens for PCP in people living with HIV; TMP-SMX remains the primary treatment
27550992 2016 Guideline (ECIL) J Antimicrob Chemother Prophylaxis recommendations in haematological malignancy and stem cell transplant; TMP-SMX is the drug of choice
33870843 2021 Review Expert Opin Pharmacother Review of Pneumocystis jirovecii with a focus on prevention and treatment
11155588 2001 Review Dermatol Clin Dapsone is useful in PCP prophylaxis in HIV disease
18971152 2008 Review J Formos Med Assoc Overview of Pneumocystis pneumonia
10073326 1999 Pharmacokinetic study J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacokinetics of trimetrexate and dapsone in AIDS patients with PCP
7937279 1994 Review Pharmacotherapy PCP prophylaxis options during pregnancy, including dapsone
9606476 1998 Case report Ann Pharmacother Dapsone-induced methemoglobinemia during PCP prophylaxis
31631707 2021 Review Drug Chem Toxicol Dapsone-induced hepatic complications

Canada Market Information

DIN Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
02481227 MAR-DAPSONE Not recorded Not recorded
02281074 ACZONE Not recorded Not recorded

Safety Considerations

  • Conditions of concern: Listed as contraindication-related conditions in the compiled data (not label text): liver disease, gallbladder disease, anemia, macrocytic anemia, G6PD deficiency, glycogen storage disease, cystinuria, galactosemia, pyruvate dehydrogenase E3 deficiency, and methemoglobinemia due to methemoglobin reductase deficiency.
  • Drug Interactions: 100 interactions were found. Moderate-level ones include aprepitant, metronidazole, picosulfuric acid, nateglinide, nitisinone, rosuvastatin, simvastatin, tinidazole, activated charcoal and troglitazone.
  • Reported adverse events in the literature: methemoglobinemia with hypoxia, hepatic complications, acute pancreatitis, and hypersensitivity syndrome.

Please also refer to the package insert for full safety information.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Proceed with Guardrails

Rationale: Several completed Phase 3 trials (about 2,000 participants combined) directly study dapsone in Pneumocystis pneumonia prevention and treatment, and network meta-analyses include dapsone-based regimens. Guidelines favour TMP-SMX first, so dapsone is best viewed as an alternative for patients who cannot take it.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Package insert warnings and contraindications from Health Canada
  • Mechanism of action data confirmed from a primary source
  • G6PD deficiency screening before use, plus monitoring for methemoglobinemia and hemolysis
  • Review of the high drug-interaction burden against the intended patient population

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.