Hydrocortisone

Evidence Level: L2 Predicted Indications: 9

Table of Contents

  1. Hydrocortisone
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Hydrocortisone: Alopecia areata
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. Canada Market Information
    9. Safety Considerations
    10. Conclusion and Next Steps
    11. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Hydrocortisone: Alopecia areata

One-Sentence Summary

Hydrocortisone is a glucocorticoid with anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects, and it is marketed in Canada in several systemic and topical products. The TxGNN model predicts it may be useful for alopecia areata, with 1 clinical trial and 19 publications retrieved for this direction. The only trial used hydrocortisone 1% cream as the low-potency comparator against clobetasol, so the evidence is at Level L2 and does not by itself show that hydrocortisone is effective in this condition.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not recorded in the local data
Predicted New Indication Alopecia areata
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9997
Evidence Level L2
Canada Market Status Marketed (marketed DINs: 15 of 16; dormant: 1)
Number of DINs 16 (marketed: 15)
Recommended Decision Proceed with Guardrails

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Based on known pharmacology, hydrocortisone is a glucocorticoid with anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects.

Alopecia areata is a T-cell-mediated autoimmune disorder in which the immune system attacks hair follicles, causing patchy hair loss. Suppressing local immune activity is therefore mechanistically plausible. Topical and intralesional corticosteroids are already used in clinical practice for this condition, and several older case series (1950s–1970s) describe intralesional hydrocortisone injections.

An important caveat: the available Phase 3 trial used hydrocortisone 1% only as the low-potency comparator against clobetasol. It mainly supports clobetasol’s superiority and gives limited evidence of hydrocortisone’s own efficacy.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT01453686 Phase 3 Completed 41 Randomized trial in children with alopecia areata comparing clobetasol propionate 0.05% cream with hydrocortisone 1% cream. Hydrocortisone served as the active low-potency comparator.

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
24226568 2014 RCT JAMA Dermatology Clobetasol 0.05% vs hydrocortisone 1% for alopecia areata in children (the published report of the trial above).
13368875 1956 Cohort Medical Times Treatment of alopecia areata with cortisone, hydrocortisone and analogs.
14158890 1963 Cohort Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas Relative efficacy of local injection of different corticoids in alopecia areata.
5989830 1966 Cohort Vestnik Dermatologii i Venerologii Intracutaneous hydrocortisone injections in alopecia areata and total alopecia.
15692503 2005 Case report J Am Acad Dermatol Four cases of congenital alopecia areata treated with topical agents including minoxidil.
13525930 1958 Review J Med Soc New Jersey Overview of alopecia areata and other common scalp problems.

Canada Market Information

DIN Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
00030619 SOLU-CORTEF Not specified Not specified
02469421 SANDOZ HYDROCORTISONE Not specified Not specified
00030929 CORTEF Not specified Not specified
02524465 AURO-HYDROCORTISONE Not specified Not specified
01954210 PRAMOX HC LOTION Lotion (per product name) Not specified

Safety Considerations

Please refer to the package insert for safety information.

Drug interaction screening returned 100 records. Examples include a Major interaction with adalimumab, and Moderate interactions with drugs such as ibuprofen, ketorolac, nifedipine, isotretinoin, acarbose and zidovudine. Minor interactions include salbutamol and formoterol.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Proceed with Guardrails

Rationale: A completed Phase 3 randomized trial and its publication directly study alopecia areata, and corticosteroids are an established approach. However, hydrocortisone was only the comparator, so the evidence for its own efficacy is limited (Level L2).

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • A trial in which hydrocortisone is the test arm, ideally with a placebo or vehicle control
  • Package insert warnings and contraindications for the relevant formulations
  • Mechanism of action data
  • A review of the drug interaction profile, particularly with adalimumab and other immunomodulators

Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.