Insulin Aspart

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 8

Table of Contents

  1. Insulin Aspart
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Insulin Aspart: Autoimmune oophoritis
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. Canada Market Information
    9. Safety Considerations
    10. Conclusion and Next Steps
    11. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Insulin Aspart: Autoimmune oophoritis

One-Sentence Summary

Insulin aspart is a rapid-acting insulin analogue, originally used to treat diabetes mellitus and diabetic ketoacidosis. The TxGNN model (deep learning) predicts it is effective for autoimmune oophoritis, with 30 clinical trials and 20 publications currently supporting this direction. Type 1 diabetes is a core, already-established use of insulin, so this prediction largely confirms existing practice rather than opening a new therapeutic area.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not recorded in the local data
Predicted New Indication Autoimmune oophoritis
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9992
Evidence Level L5
Canada Market Status Marketed (marketed DINs: 9 of 10; dormant: 1)
Number of DINs 10 (marketed: 9)
Recommended Decision Proceed with Guardrails

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Currently, detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Based on known pharmacology, insulin aspart is a rapid-acting human insulin analogue. It acts on the insulin receptor to replace deficient endogenous insulin, and it is absorbed faster than regular human insulin after subcutaneous injection.

Type 1 diabetes is defined by absolute insulin deficiency, which is the situation insulin replacement is designed to correct. The original indication (diabetes mellitus) already includes type 1 diabetes. The prediction is therefore an on-label use, not true repurposing, and the high TxGNN score is consistent with the known pharmacology.

Clinical Trial Evidence

The data compiled for this report list 30 trials. The 10 most relevant are shown below, prioritising completed Phase 3 trials directly involving insulin aspart.

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT00097071 Phase 3 Completed 299 Insulin aspart vs insulin lispro in insulin pumps in children and adolescents with T1DM
NCT02825251 Phase 3 Completed 472 Faster-acting insulin aspart vs NovoRapid by continuous subcutaneous infusion in adults with T1DM
NCT00595374 Phase 3 Completed 114 Insulin detemir + aspart vs NPH + aspart in adults with T1DM
NCT01520818 Phase 3 Completed 666 Biphasic insulin aspart 50/70 vs biphasic human insulin 30 in T1DM or T2DM
NCT01467323 Phase 3 Completed 303 Biphasic insulin aspart 30 vs biphasic human insulin 30/70, twice daily, in T1DM and T2DM
NCT00725036 Phase 3 Completed 305 Long-term safety of inhaled human insulin vs subcutaneous aspart (both with NPH) in T1DM
NCT00322257 Phase 3 Terminated 596 Inhaled mealtime insulin vs subcutaneous aspart (with detemir) in T1DM, efficacy and pulmonary safety
NCT01999322 Phase 3 Completed 37 Compatibility and safety of faster aspart and aspart with an external insulin pump in adults with T1DM
NCT01848990 Phase 4 Completed 456 Hyaluronidase pre-administration in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in T1DM; HbA1c at 6 months
NCT00593255 Phase 4 Completed 220 Insulin aspart vs human soluble insulin for postprandial glucose in Chinese patients with T1DM and T2DM

Literature Evidence

The data compiled for this report list 20 publications. The 10 most relevant are shown below.

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
27362975 2016 Systematic Review Cochrane Database Syst Rev Short-acting insulin analogues vs regular human insulin in adults with T1DM
25644227 2015 Systematic Review/Meta-analysis Pol Arch Med Wewn Efficacy and safety of insulin aspart vs regular human insulin in T1DM and T2DM
21333580 2011 Systematic Review Diabetes Metab Insulin aspart vs regular human insulin in T1DM and T2DM
23243636 2012 Systematic Review Drugs Today Insulin analogues, including aspart, for T1DM in children and adolescents
36623517 2023 RCT Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Degludec vs detemir, both with aspart, in pregnant women with T1DM (EXPECT)
37863084 2023 RCT Lancet Once-weekly icodec vs once-daily degludec in a basal-bolus regimen in T1DM (ONWARDS 6)
40445776 2025 RCT Diabetes Technol Ther Fully closed-loop delivery with faster aspart in adolescents with T1DM above HbA1c target
12215068 2002 Review Drugs Review of insulin aspart in T1DM and T2DM; mealtime dosing lowered HbA1c more than regular human insulin
15871555 2003 Review Treat Endocrinol Spotlight on insulin aspart in T1DM and T2DM
29978361 2019 Review Clin Pharmacokinet Faster insulin aspart as a new bolus option, with greater glucose lowering at 20 minutes

Canada Market Information

DIN Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
02506564 TRURAPI Not listed Not listed
02529254 TRURAPI Not listed Not listed
02460424 FIASP Not listed Not listed
02460408 FIASP Not listed Not listed
02245397 NOVORAPID Not listed Not listed

Ten valid DINs are authorised in total (TRURAPI, FIASP, NOVORAPID, KIRSTY, NOVOMIX 30). Only the first five are shown.

Safety Considerations

Please refer to the package insert for safety information.

Among the lower-ranked TxGNN predictions, injection-site localized lipodystrophy is a known adverse effect of injected insulin, and should be considered a safety signal.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Proceed with Guardrails

Rationale: Multiple completed Phase 3 trials and several systematic reviews support insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes, and the product is already marketed in Canada. Because this is an on-label use, the main gap is the missing label-based safety information, not efficacy.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Health Canada package insert warnings and contraindications (currently missing and blocking the safety screening)
  • Detailed mechanism of action data from DrugBank
  • Approved indication text and dosage forms for each DIN
  • A review of the other predicted indications (e.g., autoimmune oophoritis, stiff person syndrome), which lack any clinical evidence and should stay on Hold

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.