Insulin Glulisine

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 9

Table of Contents

  1. Insulin Glulisine
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Insulin Glulisine: Thiamine-responsive dysfunction syndrome
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. Canada Market Information
    9. Safety Considerations
    10. Conclusion and Next Steps
    11. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Insulin Glulisine: Thiamine-responsive dysfunction syndrome

One-Sentence Summary

Insulin glulisine is a rapid-acting insulin analogue, originally used to treat diabetes mellitus and diabetic ketoacidosis. This is effectively an on-label use rather than true repurposing, so the prediction is best read as a confirmation of the drug’s established role.


Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not recorded in the local data
Predicted New Indication Thiamine-responsive dysfunction syndrome
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9947
Evidence Level L5
Canada Market Status Marketed (marketed DINs: 3 of 3)
Number of DINs 3 (marketed: 3)
Recommended Decision Proceed with Guardrails

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism of action data is not available. Based on known information, insulin glulisine is a rapid-acting human insulin analogue that activates the insulin receptor to lower blood glucose. Its efficacy in diabetes mellitus has been established.

Type 1 diabetes is characterised by absolute insulin deficiency, so mealtime insulin replacement is mechanistically well suited. Insulin glulisine is already a core therapy for diabetes mellitus, which means the type 1 diabetes prediction is concordant with the known pharmacology and is an on-label use rather than a new repurposing direction.

Several of the other lower-ranked predictions (for example classic stiff person syndrome and autoimmune oophoritis) most likely reflect comorbid diabetes rather than a disease-modifying effect. Scores for predictions such as drug-induced localized lipodystrophy and pressure-induced localized lipoatrophy come from the TxGNN model (deep learning) and may reflect similarities the model learned between related diseases, not biological evidence, because injection-site lipodystrophy is a known adverse effect of insulin. None of these has any supporting clinical evidence.


Clinical Trial Evidence

The data compiled for this report include 30 registered trials. The 10 most relevant are listed below, favouring larger, randomised, directly comparative studies.

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT00115570 Phase 3 Completed 572 Glulisine vs lispro in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (26 weeks)
NCT00290979 Phase 3 Completed 250 Non-inferiority of glulisine vs lispro on HbA1c change in type 1 diabetes (28 weeks)
NCT00467376 Phase 3 Completed 485 Glulisine vs lispro with glargine in type 1 or 2 diabetes (12 weeks)
NCT00046150 Phase 3 Completed 59 Safety of glulisine vs insulin aspart in insulin pumps (CSII) in type 1 diabetes
NCT00397553 Phase 3 Completed 104 Open-label efficacy and safety of glulisine with glargine in type 1 diabetes
NCT01194245 Phase 2 Completed 135 Randomised crossover of prandial insulins with hyaluronidase (PH20) vs insulin lispro in type 1 diabetes
NCT00607087 Phase 4 Completed 289 Glulisine vs aspart and lispro in insulin pumps: hyperglycaemia and infusion set occlusion
NCT01848990 Phase 4 Completed 456 CONSISTENT 1: hyaluronidase pre-treatment of the infusion site in type 1 diabetes on CSII; HbA1c over 6 months
NCT00384085 Phase 4 Completed 588 Glargine with stepwise glulisine vs premixed insulin in type 2 diabetes (64 weeks)
NCT01204593 Phase 4 Completed 206 Basal-bolus glargine plus glulisine in uncontrolled type 1 diabetes; HbA1c change over 24 weeks

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
16308840 2005 RCT Horm Metab Res Multinational open-label comparison of glulisine vs lispro in adults with type 1 diabetes (683 randomised)
19614947 2009 RCT Diabetes Obes Metab Glulisine vs lispro with glargine in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes
35933650 2022 RCT Acta Diabetol Glulisine vs lispro and aspart in pump treatment of type 1 diabetes: HbA1c, dose, and hyper-/hypoglycaemia and DKA rates
23243636 2012 Systematic Review Drugs Today Insulin analogues for type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents
20150026 2010 Systematic Review Endocr Pract Rapid-acting analogues vs regular human insulin in basal-bolus regimens in type 1 diabetes
19496630 2009 Review Drugs Review of glulisine in diabetes: effective vs other short- and rapid-acting insulins
16706558 2006 Review Drugs Faster onset and shorter duration than regular human insulin, with similar glycaemic control
17703632 2007 Review Vasc Health Risk Manag Combining insulins for optimal glucose control, with a focus on glulisine
28544684 2017 Clinical study Pediatr Int Glulisine in CSII in 20 children with type 1 diabetes: post-meal glucose improved after 1 year
18076215 2008 Pharmacology review Clin Pharmacokinet Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: faster absorption and shorter duration than regular insulin

Canada Market Information

DIN Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
02279479 APIDRA Not specified Not specified
02294346 APIDRA Not specified Not specified
02279460 APIDRA Not specified Not specified

Safety Considerations

  • Drug Interactions: 100 interactions were identified in the interaction database. Most of those reviewed are of moderate severity, and a few are minor. Examples include:
    • Beta-agonists and sympathomimetics (salbutamol, formoterol, epinephrine, phenylephrine, pseudoephedrine)
    • Other antidiabetic agents (metformin, pioglitazone, alogliptin, albiglutide)
    • Corticosteroids (hydrocortisone)
    • Beta-blockers (acebutolol)
    • Thiazide and carbonic anhydrase inhibitor diuretics (hydrochlorothiazide, acetazolamide)
    • Ethinylestradiol and estradiol, alpelisib, doxycycline and ethanol
  • Injection-site lipodystrophy is a recognised adverse effect of insulin injections (see the lipodystrophy predictions above).

Please refer to the package insert for warnings and contraindications.


Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Proceed with Guardrails

Rationale: Several completed Phase 3 trials and randomised studies, along with systematic reviews, support insulin glulisine in type 1 diabetes, and the drug is already marketed in Canada. Because this is an established on-label use, the main limits are the missing package insert safety data and the lack of mechanism data, rather than a lack of efficacy evidence. Evidence is classified as L2 under the stated rules, although the number of completed Phase 3 studies suggests it may be stronger than this.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Health Canada package insert warnings and contraindications (a blocking gap for the safety screening step)
  • Detailed mechanism of action data
  • Approved indication text and dosage form for the three Canadian DINs
  • A review of the moderate-severity interactions, particularly with other glucose-lowering agents, beta-blockers and corticosteroids, to define monitoring guardrails
  • The other nine predicted indications (rank 2–10) should stay on Hold. Pancreatic agenesis is the only one with a plausible rationale (insulin replacement), and would need dedicated neonatal safety and dosing evaluation.

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.