Meropenem

Evidence Level: L4 Predicted Indications: 7

Table of Contents

  1. Meropenem
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Meropenem: Bacterial arthritis
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. Canada Market Information
    9. Safety Considerations
    10. Other Predicted Indications
      1. Strongest Evidence: Urinary Tract Infection
    11. Conclusion and Next Steps
    12. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Meropenem: Bacterial arthritis

One-Sentence Summary

Meropenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibiotic, originally used for serious bacterial infections such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, bacterial meningitis and peritonitis. The TxGNN model’s top prediction is bacterial arthritis, but the evidence for this is indirect: 0 registered clinical trials and 19 publications, mostly case reports, reviews and susceptibility studies. Among the ten predicted indications, the strongest evidence is for urinary tract infection (9 clinical trials, 20 publications), which is covered at the end of this report.


Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not recorded in the local data
Predicted New Indication Bacterial arthritis
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9992
Evidence Level L4
Canada Market Status Marketed (marketed DINs: 16 of 16)
Number of DINs 16 (marketed: 16)
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Based on known pharmacology, meropenem is a carbapenem that inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis by binding penicillin-binding proteins. Its efficacy in serious Gram-negative and Gram-positive infections is established.

Bacterial arthritis (septic arthritis) is caused by organisms that meropenem often covers, including Enterobacterales and some streptococci. The supporting literature is indirect:

  • Melioidosis cohorts with osteoarticular involvement, where all isolates were meropenem-susceptible
  • A case report of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae septic arthritis treated successfully with meropenem plus amikacin
  • Pharmacokinetic and tissue penetration studies, and in vitro bone cement elution work

There are no registered trials for this indication. Narrower-spectrum agents are normally preferred where the pathogen is susceptible, so meropenem’s role would be as a reserve option for resistant or polymicrobial disease.


Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials registered for bacterial arthritis.


Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
11869242 1997 Review Clin Microbiol Infect Overview of sepsis definitions and antibiotic therapy
36804370 2023 Review Int J Antimicrob Agents Off-label versus formally recommended antibiotics for multidrug-resistant bacterial infections
36678359 2022 Review Pathogens Antibiotics versus phage therapy for melioidosis
35146367 2021 Cohort Le Infezioni in Medicina Retrospective cohort of osteoarticular melioidosis
39489417 2024 Retrospective review Indian J Med Microbiol 22 musculoskeletal melioidosis cases; all isolates susceptible to meropenem
17433752 2007 Case report Joint Bone Spine ESBL Klebsiella septic arthritis treated successfully with meropenem and amikacin plus arthroscopic washout
39380073 2024 Case report J Med Case Rep Disseminated melioidosis with septic arthritis, initially misdiagnosed
38375100 2024 Case report Infect Drug Resist Suppurative meningitis with arthritis due to Streptococcus suis
37713001 2024 Antibiogram study Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Antibiogram for empiric therapy of orthopaedic infections including septic arthritis
33857030 2021 In vitro J Bone Joint Surg Am Thermal stability and elution of meropenem and other antibiotics in bone cement

Canada Market Information

DIN Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
02378787 Meropenem for Injection Not listed Not listed
02544334 Meropenem for Injection USP and Sodium Chloride Injection USP Not listed Not listed
02415224 Meropenem for Injection, USP Not listed Not listed
02421526 Taro-Meropenem Not listed Not listed
02554151 Vabomere (meropenem-vaborbactam) Not listed Not listed

All 16 authorizations are valid products; the table lists five of them.


Safety Considerations

  • Contraindication-related conditions (from the knowledge graph, not label text): epilepsy, kidney disease, pyoureter, thrombocytopenia, Clostridium difficile colitis, perinatal necrotizing enterocolitis
  • Drug Interactions: 14 interactions recorded.
    • Major: bupropion, iohexol, iopamidol
    • Moderate: picosulfuric acid, polyethylene glycol (3350 with electrolytes), nitisinone, sodium sulfate, lindane, ethinylestradiol, alpelisib, encorafenib, mycophenolic acid, pemetrexed, teriflunomide

Please refer to the package insert for warnings and contraindications.


Other Predicted Indications

Rank Indication Score Evidence Level Decision Comment
1 Bacterial arthritis 0.9992 L4 Hold Indirect evidence only
2 Epiglottitis 0.9991 L4 Hold Case reports; narrower agents are first-line
4 Laryngitis 0.9959 L5 Hold Mostly viral; literature unrelated
5 Paratyphoid fever 0.9957 L4 Hold Reserve option for XDR enteric fever; surveillance data only
7 Lyme disease 0.9946 L5 Hold In vitro data only
9 Gonococcal urethritis 0.9933 L5 Hold No clinical data; ceftriaxone established
10 Ureaplasma urethritis 0.9933 L5 Hold No cell wall, so likely a false positive

Strongest Evidence: Urinary Tract Infection

Clinical trials (9 of 10 are shown; the 10th is listed for completeness in the registry data but is a Phase 1 PK study)

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT03840148 Phase 3 Completed 661 Cefepime/VNRX-5133 versus meropenem in complicated UTI
NCT03477422 Phase 3 Completed 230 CSE-1034 versus meropenem in ESBL/MBL gram-negative infections including cUTI
NCT03891433 Phase 4 Suspended 198 Piperacillin/tazobactam versus carbapenems in ESBL UTI
NCT02142751 Phase 3 Completed 161 Fosfomycin versus meropenem or ceftriaxone in bacteraemic multidrug-resistant E. coli UTI
NCT03230838 Phase 2 Completed 134 Ceftolozane/tazobactam versus meropenem in paediatric cUTI
NCT01970371 Phase 3 Completed 69 Plazomicin versus colistin (with meropenem or tigecycline) in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections
NCT03543436 Phase 3 Completed 29 Temocillin versus a carbapenem in ESBL UTI
NCT03174795 Phase 1 Completed 20 Pharmacokinetics of RO7079901 with meropenem in cUTI
NCT00771316 Phase 3 Terminated 6 MK0826 versus meropenem in cUTI; uninformative

Meropenem is mostly the comparator in these trials, so arm-specific results should be confirmed.

Key literature

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
29486041 2018 RCT JAMA TANGO I: meropenem-vaborbactam versus piperacillin-tazobactam in cUTI
30270406 2018 RCT Infect Dis Ther TANGO II: meropenem-vaborbactam versus best available therapy in CRE infections
33058798 2021 RCT Lancet Infect Dis Cefiderocol versus high-dose extended-infusion meropenem in nosocomial pneumonia
32094128 2020 Cohort Antimicrob Agents Chemother Meropenem-vaborbactam versus ceftazidime-avibactam in CRE infections
39817442 2025 Network meta-analysis J Comp Eff Res Treatment options for cUTI and acute pyelonephritis
18416587 2008 Review Drugs Review of meropenem in serious bacterial infections

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold (for the top-ranked indication, bacterial arthritis)

Rationale:

  • The prediction is mechanistically plausible, but support is limited to case reports, cohort data and susceptibility studies. There are no registered trials, so the evidence level is L4.
  • Urinary tract infection is the only predicted indication with strong evidence (L1, Proceed with Guardrails), but it is largely an established use and the evidence comes mostly from comparator-arm data.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Health Canada package insert warnings and contraindications (a blocking gap for safety screening)
  • Detailed mechanism of action data
  • For urinary tract infection: meropenem-specific arm results from each trial, restriction to documented or suspected resistant pathogens, and carbapenem stewardship
  • For bacterial arthritis: comparative clinical data or bone and joint penetration studies before any further consideration

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.