Ranitidine

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 6

Table of Contents

  1. Ranitidine
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Ranitidine: Peptic ulcer perforation
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. Canada Market Information
    9. Safety Considerations
    10. Conclusion and Next Steps
    11. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Ranitidine: Peptic ulcer perforation

One-Sentence Summary

Ranitidine is an H2-receptor antagonist that reduces stomach acid. The TxGNN model predicts it may be useful for peptic ulcer perforation, but no clinical trials and no study that tests ranitidine as a treatment for this condition were found. The evidence level is therefore L5.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not recorded in the local data
Predicted New Indication Peptic ulcer perforation
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9988
Evidence Level L5
Canada Market Status Marketed (marketed DINs: 5 of 5)
Number of DINs 5 (marketed: 5)
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism-of-action data are not available in the data compiled for this report. Ranitidine is known as an H2-receptor blocker, a class that lowers gastric acid output.

Acid suppression is sometimes used as supportive care around a perforated ulcer, but the main treatment is surgical repair or non-operative management with antibiotics and gastric decompression. Ranitidine cannot close a perforation. The literature retrieved is indirect: reviews of long-term H2-blocker ulcer maintenance and NSAID-related stomach injury, plus a randomized trial of non-operative treatment (PMID 2927479) in which ranitidine was not the tested intervention. One placebo-controlled randomized trial (PMID 7861219) tested ranitidine to prevent postoperative gastroduodenal bleeding and perforation in high-risk neurosurgical patients, which is a different clinical question from treating an existing perforation. No study directly tests ranitidine for this condition.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials registered.

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
2927479 1989 RCT N Engl J Med Non-operative vs emergency surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcer; ranitidine was not the tested intervention
7861219 1995 RCT J Neurosurg Ranitidine vs placebo to prevent postoperative gastroduodenal bleeding or perforation in 101 high-risk neurosurgical patients (prevention, not treatment of perforation)
11488789 2001 Retrospective and randomized studies Br J Surg H. pylori eradication and ulcer recurrence after simple closure of perforated duodenal ulcer
8364140 1993 Review Aliment Pharmacol Ther Continuous H2-blocker therapy reduces ulcer recurrence in controlled trials
8103373 1993 Review Aliment Pharmacol Ther A decade of long-term H2-blocker treatment to prevent ulcer recurrence and complications
3213266 1988 Clinical study Z Rheumatol Ulcer healing with ranitidine and antacids despite continued NSAID therapy in 21 patients
8346951 1993 Clinical study Arch Dis Child Intravenous ranitidine and intragastric pH in preterm infants on dexamethasone, a group at risk of gastric perforation
1679675 1991 Review Aliment Pharmacol Ther Therapeutic recommendations for NSAID-induced gastroduodenal injury
8165479 1994 Case report Surg Endosc Giant marginal ulcer after gastroenterostomy
8781800 1996 Case report Endoscopy Gastric ulcer perforating into the heart

Canada Market Information

DIN Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
02443716 MAR-RANITIDINE Not listed Not listed
02526379 MINT-RANITIDINE Not listed Not listed
02293471 MAXIMUM STRENGTH ACID REDUCER WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION Not listed Not listed
02443708 MAR-RANITIDINE Not listed Not listed
02526387 MINT-RANITIDINE Not listed Not listed

Safety Considerations

  • Drug Interactions: 100 interactions are recorded in total. Examples include a major interaction with atazanavir, and moderate interactions with acalabrutinib, acetohexamide, aminophylline, bosutinib, brigatinib, cefuroxime, ceritinib and chlorpropamide.

Please refer to the package insert for warnings and contraindications.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: The prediction score is high, but no study tests ranitidine as treatment of peptic ulcer perforation, and the main treatment for this condition is surgical or non-operative care that ranitidine cannot replace. The evidence level is L5.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Direct clinical data on ranitidine as adjunctive therapy in perforated ulcer
  • Mechanism-of-action data
  • Package insert warnings and contraindications from Health Canada
  • A review of the major drug interactions for the intended patient group

Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.