Ustekinumab

Evidence Level: L2 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Ustekinumab
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Ustekinumab: From Psoriasis to Dermatitis
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. Canada Market Information
    9. Safety Considerations
    10. Conclusion and Next Steps
    11. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Ustekinumab: From Psoriasis to Dermatitis

One-Sentence Summary

Ustekinumab was originally used to treat psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and related skin conditions. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for dermatitis (mainly atopic dermatitis), supported by 6 registered clinical trials (2 directly relevant Phase 2 trials) and 20 publications. The evidence is early-stage and shows modest, inconsistent efficacy.


Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, parapsoriasis (the Canadian licence records contain no indication text)
Predicted New Indication Dermatitis
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9999
Evidence Level L2 (no completed Phase 3 trial in dermatitis; the strongest data are two completed Phase 2 randomized trials)
Canada Market Status Marketed (marketed DINs on record: at least 20)
Number of DINs at least 20
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Based on known information, ustekinumab is a human monoclonal antibody that blocks the p40 subunit shared by interleukin-12 (IL-12) and interleukin-23 (IL-23). This inhibits Th1 and Th17/Th22 immune pathways.

These pathways drive inflammation in psoriasis, where ustekinumab’s efficacy is established. They are also implicated in the chronic phase of atopic dermatitis, especially the Th22/IL-23 axis. This is the basis for the prediction.

The rationale is only partial, however. Atopic dermatitis is predominantly driven by Th2 immunity, which ustekinumab does not target directly. Published Phase 2 data show modest and inconsistent efficacy, so the link is plausible but not confirmed.


Clinical Trial Evidence

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT01945086 Phase 2 Completed 79 Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of two ustekinumab doses in Japanese adults with severe atopic dermatitis. This is the strongest trial in the set.
NCT01806662 Phase 2 Completed 32 Randomized pilot of ustekinumab in chronic atopic dermatitis with sub-optimal response to prior therapy. The small sample limits its strength.
NCT05535738 Phase 2/3 Active, not recruiting 45 Contact dermatitis model using biologics and suction blistering to study skin inflammation. It is mechanistic and exploratory, so relevance is indirect.
NCT02074982 Phase 3 Completed 676 CLEAR study of secukinumab versus ustekinumab in plaque psoriasis. Ustekinumab is only the comparator, so it gives no evidence for dermatitis.
NCT01356758 N/A Completed 126 Cardiovascular risk assessment in severe psoriasis patients on biologics. Not relevant to dermatitis efficacy.
NCT07352566 Phase 4 Not yet recruiting 10 Microdevice for testing drugs directly in skin in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. It is a methodology study with no efficacy evidence.

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
27304428 2017 RCT Experimental Dermatology Phase 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 33 patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis assessing efficacy and safety of ustekinumab.
28338223 2017 RCT (Phase 2) British Journal of Dermatology Randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 study of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with severe atopic dermatitis.
29164954 2018 Systematic review Journal of Dermatological Treatment Evaluated efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in atopic dermatitis.
33849369 2022 Real-world evidence analysis Journal of Dermatological Treatment Assessed ustekinumab in atopic dermatitis; prior reports are anecdotal with conflicting results.
33074565 2021 Systematic review / meta-analysis Allergy Evidence appraisal of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, supporting the EAACI guideline.
29098604 2018 Systematic review / meta-analysis American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Examined whether biologics are efficacious in atopic dermatitis.
36208443 2022 Review Dermatologic Therapy Synthesized the off-label uses of ustekinumab.
32347968 2020 Review Contact Dermatitis Reviewed available data on biologics in allergic contact dermatitis.
32172523 2020 Review Clinical Drug Investigation Examined atopic dermatitis therapies that failed clinical trials, to understand reasons for failure.
33282108 2020 Review Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology Reviewed biologic options for pediatric psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, including off-label use.

Canada Market Information

Ustekinumab products have 20 valid licences in Canada, all single-ingredient. Dosage form and approved indication text were not available for them. The main authorizations are:

DIN Product Name
02320673 STELARA
02320681 STELARA
02459671 STELARA I.V.
02544199 WEZLANA
02550245 STEQEYMA

Other biosimilar brands also hold licences: YESINTEK, JAMTEKI, OTULFI and FINLIUS.


Safety Considerations

  • Drug Interactions: 100 interactions were identified in total; the main ones listed are:
    • Moderate: corticosteroids (hydrocortisone, triamcinolone, dexamethasone, betamethasone, budesonide, prednisone, prednisolone), simvastatin, anticoagulants (apixaban, warfarin, rivaroxaban, dicoumarol), and radiopharmaceuticals/radioimmunotherapies (iobenguane I-131, ibritumomab tiuxetan, tositumomab).
    • Minor: zinc salts (sulfate, acetate, gluconate, chloride).

For warnings and contraindications, please refer to the package insert.


Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: Two completed Phase 2 randomized trials exist in atopic dermatitis, but published efficacy is modest and inconsistent. The mechanistic rationale is only partial because the disease is mainly Th2-driven. No Phase 3 evidence exists, and package insert safety information has not yet been reviewed, which blocks safety screening.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Health Canada package insert warnings and contraindications, to enable safety screening
  • Detailed mechanism of action data
  • Critical review of the Phase 2 trial results (NCT01945086 and NCT01806662) for effect size and responder subgroups
  • Evidence that a subgroup (e.g., chronic-phase or Th22/IL-23-high disease) benefits, ideally from a larger controlled trial
  • Review of interaction management, particularly with corticosteroids and anticoagulants

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.